#16383 PAIRS BTM QLD (WAS BBT) (14-SEP-20)

Pair 2 EW - Pam Scarr / Carrolyn McMurray
Place: 2, Percentage: 57.03%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: John Lodge-Tm / Kate Head-Tm	4 E	9D	9	-50	1	6%
Board 2	6: John Lodge-Tm / Kate Head-Tm	4 W	2S	10	130	12	75%
Board 3	6: John Lodge-Tm / Kate Head-Tm	2 E	AD	7	-100	4	25%
Board 4	6: John Lodge-Tm / Kate Head-Tm	5 E	4H	11	600	14	88%
Board 5	7: Colleen Moule / Ian Cameron	2 W	AC	8	110	13	81%
Board 6	7: Colleen Moule / Ian Cameron	1NT S	8S	8	-120	8	50%
Board 7	7: Colleen Moule / Ian Cameron	4 E	5S	11	650	16	100%
Board 8	7: Colleen Moule / Ian Cameron	3 W	AH	10	130	10	62%
Board 9	3: Vincent Vine / Oonah Vine	4 N	KD	8	100	11	69%
Board 10	3: Vincent Vine / Oonah Vine	2 W	5H	10	130	1	6%
Board 11	3: Vincent Vine / Oonah Vine	2 W	KC	10	170	13	81%
Board 12	3: Vincent Vine / Oonah Vine	5NT W	KC	11	460	15	94%
Board 13	5: Anne Hollywood-Tm / Chris Pender-Tm	1NT W	6H	7	90	10	62%
Board 14	5: Anne Hollywood-Tm / Chris Pender-Tm	4 N	8D	8	100	14	88%
Board 15	5: Anne Hollywood-Tm / Chris Pender-Tm	3NT W	5H	8	-50	5	31%
Board 16	5: Anne Hollywood-Tm / Chris Pender-Tm	4 W	JH	9	-100	11	69%
Board 17	8: Lynne Johansen / Denise Rice	4 S	AC	9	50	15	94%
Board 18	8: Lynne Johansen / Denise Rice	6NT N	3H	13	-1470	8	50%
Board 19	8: Lynne Johansen / Denise Rice	4 S	AD	9	50	13	81%
Board 20	8: Lynne Johansen / Denise Rice	4 N	KD	11	-650	4	25%
Board 21	1: Richard Booth-Tm / Dianne Hiles-Tm	4 N	KS	12	-680	2	12%
Board 22	1: Richard Booth-Tm / Dianne Hiles-Tm	1 W	AC	8	110	10	62%
Board 23	1: Richard Booth-Tm / Dianne Hiles-Tm	1NT E	3C	6	-100	2	12%
Board 24	1: Richard Booth-Tm / Dianne Hiles-Tm	1 W	AD	6	-50	7	44%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results